Dining Over the Divide: Perspectives on Immigration and Culture
Introducing the Participants
Stephen, sixty-four, Canvey Island
Occupation: Former insurance professional
Political history: Typically Conservative, except when he lived in “the socialist republic of south Hackney” and voted for the SDP
Amuse bouche: His specialty in insurance was kidnap and ransom: “Everyone always says that insurance is dull, but it’s not when you’re planning rescuing people from South Korea because the North Koreans have activated the weapon systems”
Eva, 25, the capital
Profession: Graduate in psychology
Political history: In her native land, Aotearoa, she supported both Labour and Green
Amuse bouche: Eva has been employed as a singer on ocean liners; her most extended voyage was half a year, which is a long time to be at sea
For starters
Eva: Steve seemed there to have a nice time, to be open
He: She seemed like a very bright, well-spoken, nice person
She: I had a caprese salad, pasta with fungi, and a rich sweet treat, it was very good
The big beef
She: He was definitely on the side of immigration being reduced. He thinks that British people who already live here, including non-white Caucasian Britons, face limited access to the essential services, because increasing numbers are arriving. Whereas I just don’t think the numbers are so problematic
Steve: I’m for qualified migrants, I have no desire to reside in a homogeneous, WASP country with warm beer. But I believe that governments have used immigration to occupy positions they can’t get people to do without increasing salaries. Wages are suppressed, so levies have to be minimized, so we can’t do things better – spend more money on childcare, on education, on technology
Eva: I am not deeply informed of Brexit, because I was sixteen and not living here when it happened. He explained it to me in a different perspective. He informed me about “posted workers” – candidates could come here and receive solely the wage of the their nation of origin
Steve: The French president spent 24 months getting the EU to abolish the scheme; it was revised in two thousand eighteen. Previously, posted workers coming in were undercutting British workers. Under Gordon Brown, it was petroleum staff that were brought in; since then it’s been hospitality, agriculture. She understood that, because she’d worked on a cruise ship and said she was earning significantly higher than international colleagues
Common ground
He: It would be great to have a different energy source, come off of oil. I disapprove of environmental harm, I love the clean air, I love the countryside. We found consensus on a lot of that. But I said, “What do you think of the Scandinavian nation?” Their oil and gas profits soared after the conflict began, they used that money to develop eco-friendly systems
She: So we’re using their oil. You can see that’s an unfavorable approach to go about things. He was supportive of continuing our own oil exploration for the small amount we’ll require in the coming years. I kind of agree with him. We’re still going to use planes. We both think we should be advancing to greener solutions, windfarms and hydro
Dessert topics
Eva: We touched on Islamophobia, though we didn’t call it that. He seemed concerned about extremism coming here – he did note that a many individuals in Middle Eastern countries were radical, which I didn’t think accurate. I think it’s prejudiced to form opinions based on religion
He: I come from the East End. I asked her if she’d been to Whitechapel, and she said it had been modernized. Naturally, I would say that: populated by professionals. But when I go down Chrisp Street market, I appear out of place. People gaze at me because it’s become very Muslim. She had a little look at me about that. I used the word “ghetto”. Eva’s got Polish-Jewish ancestry – she doesn’t like that word, to her it denotes deprivation. I said, “No, it’s an area that becomes theirs.” I consented to substitute a different word – maybe community?
She: I feel like followers of Islam are really overrepresented in the media as doing things wrong. It appears a somewhat discriminatory, or prejudiced against foreigners
Conclusion
He: I think we parted on good terms. We had a hug at the station
She: We both said that we’d had a lovely time