🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters applauding your insights on growing your venture? Do recruiters making contact to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment this week after popular discussions indicated that switching their gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to include what they called "bro-coded" terminology - adding action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who employ professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts are shown to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her audience decline significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with similar "agentic" style

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - brief and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and confident - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, saying "Every day I continued, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants experienced favorable results. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "white" reported a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to informal experiments where identical content by male and female users received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and distribute posts based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."